Please upgrade your browser

We take your security very seriously. In order to protect you and our systems, we are making changes to all HSBC websites that means some of the oldest web browser versions will no longer be able to access these sites. Generally, the latest versions of a browser (like Edge, Chrome, Safari, etc.) and an operating system family (like Microsoft Windows, MacOS) have the most up-to-date security features.

If you are seeing this message, we have detected that you are using an older, unsupported browser.

See how to update your browser

Europe Insights

From cyclical to structural
20 March 2026
    Articles
    Download the full report PDF, 540KB

    Market spotlight: A maturing eurozone market

    The eurozone is increasingly behaving less like a cyclical allocation and more like a structural investment destination. Cross-border portfolio flows since 2023 illustrate this shift. Elevated geopolitical risk, tariff uncertainty and diverging global monetary policies have triggered broad portfolio reallocation towards Europe.

    Immediately after the pandemic, eurozone investors displayed a pronounced home bias, with roughly half of their fixed income allocations held in domestic sovereign and corporate debt. By mid-2025, however, widening yield differentials encouraged greater exposure to foreign bonds as investors searched for carry and duration. The change reflected diversification, rather than a loss of confidence.

    Crucially, outward allocation has not reduced foreign interest in Europe. Portfolio inflows reached almost EUR 850 billion in 2024 and remained close in 2025 at EUR 830 billion. The modest decline was driven mainly by lower debt purchases, while equity demand remained resilient, suggesting investors increasingly view Europe as a stable allocation, rather than a tactical macro trade.

    Figure 1: Foreign investment in euro securities – change in portfolio positioning (billion euros)

    Figure 1: Foreign investment in euro securities – change in portfolio positioning (billion euros)

    Click the image to enlarge

    Figure 2: Foreign investment in eurozone debt securities (billion euros, 12 months sum)

    Figure 2: Foreign investment in eurozone debt securities (billion euros, 12 months sum)

    Click the image to enlarge

    Source: Refinitiv, European Central Bank, HSBC Asset Management. Data as of 9 March 2026.

    Within sovereign markets, differentiation has become more pronounced. Germany has re-emerged as the region’s anchor safe asset, attracting record non-resident purchases of EUR 241 billion over the twelve months to November as positive yields returned to Bunds under ECB normalisation. France demonstrated the sensitivity of flows to politics, with inflows weakening during the 2024 election cycle before stabilising. Italy, by contrast, has seen sustained foreign participation following rating upgrades and improved stability, yet foreign ownership remains near one-third of outstanding bonds, leaving capacity for further inflows.

    More revealing is the structure of capital flows. Cross-Atlantic allocation remains limited, with eurozone investors holding roughly a quarter of foreign US bonds, while US investors owning only about 8 per cent of eurozone bonds, but intra-European integration is deepening. French investors hold about 16 per cent of Italian debt and German investors roughly 13 per cent of French sovereign bonds, while regional ownership of Italian debt remains near 70 per cent.

    Figure 3: Debt securities held by euro area investment funds (%)

    Figure 3: Debt securities held by euro area investment funds (%)

    Click the image to enlarge

    Source: Refinitiv, HSBC Asset Management. Data as of 12 February 2026

    The broader implication is that allocation decisions now respond more to policy credibility, fiscal transparency and institutional coordination than to global risk sentiment. Inflation progress, EU funding programmes and coordinated fiscal initiatives have strengthened confidence in the policy framework. Europe is gradually transitioning from a recovery story into a maturing financial system whose diversification comes from internal dispersion rather than external capital dependence. That evolution provides the foundation for equity markets where Europe is re-establishing itself as a stable component within global portfolios as well as for fixed income markets where the definition of defensive assets itself is evolving.

    European equities

    Stabilisation rather than rotation

    For over a decade, global portfolios steadily migrated toward US equities while Europe frequently acted as a funding source. Between 2009 and early 2026, US equity funds attracted roughly EUR 224 billion in net inflows, while European funds experienced EUR 316 billion of outflows - a divergence exceeding EUR 540 billion.

    Two structural forces drove this imbalance. First was the shift from active to passive investing, where benchmark composition favoured US markets. Second was persistent US technology leadership. Although US active funds lost EUR 85 billion, passive vehicles attracted EUR 309 billion, producing strongly positive flows. Meanwhile, inflows into passive European funds of EUR 104 billion failed to offset the EUR 420 billion outflows from active funds.

    Figure 1: US equity fund flows (2009 – YTD 2026)

    Figure 1: US equity fund flows (2009 – YTD 2026)

    Click the image to enlarge

    Figure 2: Europe equity fund flows (2009 – YTD 2026)

    Figure 2: Europe equity fund flows (2009 – YTD 2026)

    Click the image to enlarge

    Source: Refinitiv, Broadridge, HSBC Asset Management. Data as of February 2026

    Recent data, however, has stabilised. Flows still favoured the US in 2023-24, but by 2025 and early 2026 the gap narrowed significantly. US equity funds received around EUR 19.9 billion and EUR 1.8 billion of inflows versus EUR 15.6 billion and EUR 1.7 billion into Europe. Crucially, the improvement in Europe is almost entirely passive. Investors are rebuilding exposure through index vehicles rather than discretionary stock selection, implying normalisation of asset allocation rather than renewed conviction in European alpha.

    Euro area funds simultaneously increased US exposure from 18 per cent of assets in 2010 to 41 per cent by late-2025, yet a modest home bias has re-emerged since 2024. Investors are adding Europe alongside, not instead of, US holdings.

    This matters because it confirms the shift identified in capital flow dynamics, which is that the Europe is no longer simply a cyclical trade. Valuation discounts, improving policy stability and steadier flows point toward equilibrium rather than rotation. Europe is becoming a complementary allocation – a diversification sleeve rather than a replacement for US growth exposure.

    European fixed income

    Redefining the defensive anchor

    As eurozone market is maturing, European fixed income reveals where that maturation has the clearest portfolio implications. Historically, European bond framework had government bonds – especially German Bunds – for safety and corporate credit for incremental yield. That distinction is now less clear.

    The starting point is supply. Germany’s historic fiscal pivot toward infrastructure and defence spending marks a break from decades of fiscal conservatism. Larger sovereign issuance reduces the scarcity premium that long underpinned Bund valuations. Government bonds remain liquid and systemically important, but they are no longer uniquely insulated from macro and fiscal dynamics. In practical terms, pure duration exposure now carries more policy and supply risk than in the past.

    At the same time, corporate balance sheets entered this phase in relatively strong condition. Investment grade issuers maintain extended maturity profiles, healthy interest coverage and disciplined funding access. Credit spreads have remained contained despite tighter financial conditions, and total fixed income net supply is expected to stabilise, even as sovereign issuance increasingly crowds out corporate paper. That technical backdrop of constrained credit supply against structural institutional demand supports spread resilience.

    Figure 1: Euro Credit net supply (billions)

    Figure 1: Euro Credit net supply (billions)

    Click the image to enlarge

    Source: HSBC Asset Management. Data as of March 2026.

    This dynamic creates an asymmetric outcome. In a falling-rate scenario, corporate bonds benefit from both duration and carry. In a rising rate environment driven by renewed inflation or fiscal concerns, the additional spread income provides a cushion relative to sovereign bonds. In both cases, high quality corporate credit offers a more balanced risk-return profile than pure government duration.

    Historical precedent reinforces this logic. During the 2011–12 sovereign crisis, Italian government spreads widened sharply, yet corporate spreads tightened following ECB intervention, illustrating how central bank liquidity often transmits more directly into credit markets than into sovereign premia. More recently, heavily oversubscribed ultra-long corporate issuance – including century maturities – highlights investor willingness to treat certain high-grade corporates as duration anchors comparable to sovereigns. For fixed income investors, therefore, high-quality investment grade corporate bonds increasingly function as a core defensive allocation, not merely a satellite exposure. In an environment where traditional safe assets are being repriced, institutional investors might continue to support best-rated corporate credit markets.

    Download the full report PDF, 540KB

    Related articles

    Back to top